Nber Working Paper Series Conflicts of Interest Distort Public Evaluations: Evidence from the Top 25 Ballots of Ncaa Football Coaches
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper provides a study on conflicts of interest among college football coaches participating in the USA Today Coaches Poll of top 25 teams. The Poll provides a unique empirical setting that overcomes many of the challenges inherent in conflict of interest studies, because many agents are evaluating the same thing, private incentives to distort evaluations are clearly defined and measurable, and there exists an alternative source of computer rankings that is bias free. Using individual coach ballots between 2005 and 2010, we find that coaches distort their rankings to reflect their own team's reputation and financial interests. On average, coaches rank teams from their own athletic conference nearly a full position more favorably and boost their own team's ranking more than two full positions. Coaches also rank teams they defeated more favorably, thereby making their own team look better. When it comes to ranking teams contending for one of the high-profile Bowl Championship Series (BCS) games, coaches favor those teams that generate higher financial payoffs for their own team. Reflecting the structure of payoff disbursements, coaches from non-BCS conferences band together, while those from BCS conferences more narrowly favor teams in their own conference. Among all coaches an additional payoff between $3.3 and $5 million induces a more favorable ranking of one position. Moreover, for each increase in a contending team's payoff equal to 10 percent of a coach's football budget, coaches respond with more favorable rankings of half a position, and this effect is more than twice as large when coaches rank teams outside the top 10. Matthew Kotchen School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, School of Management, and Department of Economics Yale University 195 Prospect Street New Haven, CT 06511 and NBER [email protected] Matthew Potoski University of California, Santa Barbara 2400 Bren Hall Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Nber Working Paper Series Academics vs. Athletics: Career Concerns for Ncaa Division I Coaches
We analyze the promotions and firings of NCAA Division 1 college basketball and college football coaches to assess whether these coaches are rewarded for the academic performance of their players in promotion and retention decisions. We find that an increase in Academic Progress Rate, as measured by the NCAA, for a college team in either sport significantly reduces the probability that the coac...
متن کاملMinimizing Game Score Violations in College Football Rankings
One metric used to evaluate the myriad ranking systems in college football is retrodictive accuracy. Maximizing retrodictive accuracy is equivalent to minimizing game score violations: the number of times a past game's winner is ranked behind its loser. None of the roughly 100 current ranking systems achieves this objective. Using a model for minimizing violations that exploits problem characte...
متن کاملPredicting NFL and NCAA Offensive Play Calling
The NFL and NCAA Football are multi-billion dollar industry. Despite this, the process of preparing to face an opponent is a relative anachronism. Coaches watch and take notes of their opponents' game footage the week before game day. When it comes time to call plays, they rely on their memory and instincts in order to call the proper play. A defense would be at a distinct advantage if their co...
متن کاملA Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins
We introduce a penalized maximum likelihood approach for ranking all NCAA Division 1-A college football teams. The model does not consider margin of victory and is based solely on win/loss data. Despite the simplicity, the model leads to rankings which exhibit greater agreement with expert opinion (i.e. AP and Coaches polls) than the models historically and currently used by the Bowl Championsh...
متن کاملPreliminary Draft: Not for Citation or Quotation
Managing organizational reputations is a central strategic challenge for public and nonprofit managers. Because an industry reputation is a collective good, individual organizations do not always have the incentive to promote their industry’s collective reputation. As in common property settings generally, individuals have greater incentives to boost collective reputations when consumption of t...
متن کامل